Tag Archives: Benedict Cumberbatch

Thor: Ragnarok – Is it Asgard or Asgard beings?..

After six years, a new Thor-titled series has been released as Thor: Ragnarok, this time presented by Marvel Entertainment overwhelmingly. For those who are curious, Paramount Pictures‘ support seems to have been replaced by Walt Disney Pictures in the current one.

This piece brings us back to the holy nine realms where Thor, Odinson, king of Asgard (after the former ruler Odin) and god of thunder, is defending against his sister Hela, goddess of death, in order to preserve peace (or questionably his power maybe) and to protect people.

Until Thor and Hela meet for the struggle to boost, here we go with

  • the introduction of Thor in a cage captured by the fire demon Surtur foretelling a dreadful prophecy, Ragnarok, which will be revealed at the end of the sequel for its becoming true or not;
  • Thor‘s interim beating Surtur for the crown of Surtur to prevent his resurrection by the Eternal Flame; and
  • exclusive referrals clearly to Greek mythology (rather than pure nordic myths) such as grape eating Odin watching a classical tragedy in pleasure / the B.C. costumes though all is appearing in smart tech times with various models of space ships that travel at the speed of light etc.

One can even say that the plot is a modified version of the classical Hellenistic plays in terms of design. Just, it likely varies for its complicated frame of the characters: mighty Thor, seemingly peaceful and encouraging Odin, tricky Loki, saviour Heimdall, and she-evil Hela. The main characters are surrounded closely by stronger side ones or villains as mostly intended in Marvel comics: Grandmaster (Jeff Goldblum) being a prototype for that, there are also some greyish ones like Hulk (Mark Ruffalo) or Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) which serves to add further complexity to the cinematic universe.

The overall flow is well-put. The plot’s dynamic and professional structure pays for the high technology used in shooting. In other words, Taika Waititi‘s directing and the adaptation can be concluded as to cover the expenditure finely.

Cast can be interpreted as pretty much successful as well, in particular having those great actors in place, i.e., Anthony Hopkins (Odin) and Benedict Cumberbatch (Dr. Strange). For instance, a lesson-wise intonation of Odin makes the scene unforgettable during the following conversation with Thor:

Thor (Chris Hemsworth): ”I am not as strong as you!”

Odin (Anthony Hopkins): ”No, you are stronger…”

Or it all changes when the camera is in 177a Bleecker Street, Dr. Strange‘s house in Midgard (Earth) where Cumberbatch shines with his hypnotic ability of acting. Once again, it is proven that the magnitude of acting is not counted by the number of minutes that an actor is on screen, however it stands for the emotional and intellectual impact after the movie ends.

Chris Hemsworth, physically, draws a very American Thor at first glance with a narrow forehead and small eyes. It can be teased as the irony of evolution like what happen to Norse Gods when they come to New World.

I do not want to mention Cate Blanchett as Hela since I am personally more than fed up with her unchanging alto timbre, more or less with the same resonance, for years…

However, aforementioned two gigantic actors and glazing visual effects still save the cast, I can say. Only few comments both to that overused blurry background whilst aiming to emphasize the characters in the front, and the unproportional images of Surtur shots. The idea to exaggerate Surtur versus Thor seems a little bit ”pretended”, unfortunately due to a perspective trap.

In a nutshell, Asgard as the head of nine realms where peace was known to be brought by Odin encounter a ”to be or not to be” problem in Thor: Ragnarok.

Thor: Ragnarok asks: will Asgard kneel before the queen of death or will it fight for survival? Furthermore, is Asgard a place to be saved but the people, or is it the people?.. Or should the enemy that was created somehow be destroyed at a price of smashing Asgardians’ land, perhaps?..

Including the revolutionary IMAX 3D optics, Thor: Ragnarok (2017) holds its own specialties worth seeing.

The Imitation Game – A war hero or a criminal?…


The Imitation Game – A war hero or a criminal?…

‘Are you paying attention?’ is the opening sentence of Morten Tyldum‘s, 2014 year movie, The Imitation Game. It is a dramatic story that intends to pay our attention to the spotlights of Alan Turing‘s (Benedict Cumberbatch) life as the British mathematician who cracked the Nazis’ Enigma code in World War II and who is the inspiration of Turing Machines, known as computers today.

The opening sentence in the interrogation room is depicted as a result of a burglary investigation in Turing‘s house in 1952 although Turing insists that nothing has been stolen from home. Then, the story takes us to London of 1939 where it all starts. Turing has applied for a top secret position in Bletchley and is called for a job interview with Commander Denniston (Charles Dance). Commander is very much impressed with this 27-year old prodigy in Cambridge despite his vain-in-modest refusals that he could not be claimed as a prodigy.

At the end of the interview, Turing is offered a top secret role as the Enigma codebreaker which is described as impossible and he accepts it. After some time, he has problems with his superior, Commander, regarding the funding of a devised machine to crack the code. And he talks to British Secret Intelligence Service Chef Stewart Menzies (Mark Strong), and decides to take the issue up with Winston Churchill.

Churchill agrees funding his machine and appoints him as the team leader where Turing rebuilds the team by narrowing it down with Hugh Alexander (Matthew Goode), John Cairncross (Allen Leech), Peter Hilton (Matthew Beard), and Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley). Clarke as a new comer to the team is a math genius herself and a loyal support to Turing throughout her life. Thenceforth, movie combines the story of Turing himself with his homosexual orientation in UK in 1950s and all the challenges that he faced, and decoding of Enigma by a group of genius young people leaded by Turing.

The Imitation Game is known as the highest-grossing independent film of 2014. The Norweggian director, Morten Tyldum, does an excellent job in the management of cast, crew and the story in order to make this movie overall a masterpiece of all the times. It is an extraordinary story telling and a memorable way of melting the script and a staggering human rights issue together in one pot. The script is adapted from the book of Andrew HodgesAlan Turing: The Enigma‘ by Graham Moore. It is obviously designed in a structured and ordered manner that could be taught, by default, as a best practice in any of the cinema schools. When this faultless script has met its Director and stellar cast, the inevitable cinematic miracle is born.

Regarding the performances, Benedict Cumberbatch is glorious in his role as Alan Turing. He reflects the arrogance and naiveness at the same time which sounds impossible to perform. He wears Turing not simply as a character, but also echoes his reactions and emotions via diversifying them per each occurence.

Ultimately, all cast does an amazing job in this 114 minutes movie. One of the most remarkable supporting characters is created by Mark Strong with his poker face, cold manner and deeply convincing voice as in the role of MI6 Chef. He fixes his physical liability into the role so successfully that there is not even a bit of overacting despite the character’s tendency to that. Cinema fans could remember him recently from Before I Go to Sleep (2014) and Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy in 2011.

The Imitation Game, mainly, talks about the obvious codes used in war and obscure codes used against man by law and public. Both the script and direction are perfectly tailored to imply it. Life struggle of such an extraordinary genius is worth shooting this deep picture indeed and should be behaved as key take-aways for the dark and bitter face of civilized-called humanbeings in order not to repeat it again. Turing changed the course of the world history by revealing the secret. On the other hand, he was in a never-ending fight with human’s jealousy and irrationalism of being pleaded guilty for simply being a homosexual only. So, the question is: Was he a war hero or a criminal against British law in 1950s?… Was he able to unlock the cruel judgement on different tastes and different preferences? Or just because someone is thinking different than you still mean that he / she should be judged and charged to death in depth?…

From the beginning, the story raises an indestructible morality and strengthens it with scenes and quotes such as the following: ”If you fire Alan, then you have to fire me too (by each individual in his team to the upper management)” or ”We are not like other people, we love each other in our own way, and we can have the life together that we want (Clarke to Turing)” or ”The world is an infinitely better place precisely because you weren’t (normal)” or ”Humans find violence deeply satisfying. But remove the satisfaction, and the act becomes… hollow”. This finely plot setting apparently magnifies the end of the film to grow impressively striking for the audience. The entire scenario is enriched with unforgettable dialogues that would serve as quotes to the next generations for decades, ”Sometimes it is the people who no one imagines anything of who do the things that no one can imagine” is one of the most recognizable ones…

Finally, this is an amazingly inspirational story to be heard. More than a story, it is the history where 49,000 homosexual men were convicted of gross indecency under British law between the years 1885 and 1967 where their punishment for being a homosexual ended with mostly a jail imprisonment or enforced chemical castration therapy. Benedict Cumberbatch, who is nominated for the Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in Academy Awards 2015, has already put his name to an open letter urging the British government to give royal pardon to those men convicted of gross indecency. If life demands struggle, via the help of an expression in the movie, God does not win the war, humans win the war.

As Turing asks, can we judge whether he is a machine or a humanbeing? … and history is the sharpest self-evident judgement in the world ever… noone can ever imagine it.

”Sometimes it is the people who no one imagines anything of who do the things that no one can imagine.”

Film Bocugu – Feb, 2015